“Instrumentalized Immigrants”… The “Migrant-Military Industrial Complex” - One Raid at a Time: How Immigrant Crackdowns Build the National Security State - PublicEye.org
Mar 22nd, 2008 by Da' Buffalo
Implicit in daily media reports about “immigration reform” is the idea that bottom-up pressure led to the decision to dismantle the former INS and then place the immigration bureaucracy under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Citizen activism contributed significantly to the most massive, most important government restructuring since the end of World War II. Nor do press accounts mention Boeing and other aerospace and surveillance companies, which, for example, will benefit as government contractors to the federal Secure Border Initiative (SBI) that is scheduled to receive more than $2 billion in funding for fencing, electronic surveillance and other equipment required for the new physical and virtual fence being built at the border.3
Nowhere in the more popular explanations of this historic and massive government restructuring of immigration and other government functions do the raisons d’etat – the reasons of the state, the logic of government – enter the picture. When talking about immigration reform, what little, if any, agency ascribed to the Bush Administration usually includes such mantra-like phrases like “protecting the homeland,” “securing the border,” and others. And even in the immigrant rights community few, for example, are asking why the Bush Administration decided to move the citizenship processing and immigration enforcement functions of government from the more domestic, policing-oriented Department of Justice (DOJ) to the more militarized, anti-terrorist bureaucracy of the Department of Homeland Security.
Little, if any, consideration is given to the possibility that immigrants and immigration policy serve other interests that have nothing to do with chasing down maids, poultry workers, and landscapers.

Spring 2008 Vol. 23, No. 1
One Raid at a Time:
How Immigrant Crackdowns Build the National Security State
By Roberto Lovato
Roberto Lovato is a New York-based writer with New America Media and a member of The Public Eye editorial board.
“He [King George] has erected a multitude of new offices and set hither swarms of officers to harass out people and eat out their subsistence.” The Declaration of Independence, 1776
III The Lessons of History
History provides several precedents that illustrate how immigrants have consistently provided elite political and corporate interests the rationale for major government restructuring that often has little to do with migration and much to do with other things, things like: bureaucratic patronage (think big government contracts for military industrial firms); deploying and displaying power; controlling the populace and rallying different sectors of society round the idea of the nation (nationalism).
Long before the Patriot Act, DHS and ICE, policies linking immigrants to the security of the country have formed an important part of U.S. statecraft.The period before and after the passage of the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798(14), which gave then-president John Adams the authority to remove any immigrant he deemed a threat to national security, is one example.
During this time, the Bush-like enumeration of “Seditious Acts” was linked to the elite need to control the populace, and militarize the society in times of profound instability.
Another example is the period of the Red Scare of 1919, when millions of mostly-immigrant-led strikers provided the political impetus leading to the creation of the domestic policing bureaucracy known as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).(15)
History has shown that, in times of extraordinary instability, governments go to extraordinary lengths and spend extraordinary amounts of money to create and reinforce the ramparts of their policing apparatus and of nationhood itself. Current efforts by the U.S. government to instrumentalize immigrants as a means of buttressing itself in times of domestic and geopolitical crisis follows a logic tried and true since the establishment of the country amidst the global and internal turbulence around the turn of the 18th century.
IV Immigrants and the Establishment of the National Security State
Like many of the newly established countries suffering some of the political and economic shocks of economic and political modernization in the late eighteenth century, the fledgling United States and its leaders needed to simultaneously consolidate the nation state established constitutionally in 1787 while also maneuvering for a position on a global map dominated by the warring powers of France and England. Central to accomplishing this were immigrants who provided both a means of rallying and aligning segments of the populace while also legitimating massive expenditures towards the construction of the militarized bureaucracies meant to defend against domestic threats to “national” security which linked external enemies real and perceived.
At the turn of the 18th century, the United States was much weaker than and still very vulnerable to the power of Britain and France, which were engaged in a war that defined political positions inside and outside the new country. Like many of their elite and more imperially inclined Federalist peers, Alexander Hamilton and President John Adams were fearful of the French revolution. Developments in the revolutionary republic pushed people and states around the Atlantic world to take positions for and against the revolution at that time. In addition, some Federalists like Hamilton also wanted to push out the French and conquer Florida, Louisiana, and South America.(16)
Immigrants and immigration policy of the post-revolutionary period became ensnared in the battle for power between Federalists, who advocated a more urban and mercantile route to nationhood, and the anti-Federalist Republicans led by Thomas Jefferson,
whose romantic proto-capitalist path to consolidation of the nation was paved by agrarian expansion. The battles between the Federalists and anti-Federalists played themselves out in relation to France and the ideals of the French revolution, as elites tried to cope with the instability wrought by capitalist expansion on the rural majority.
The political, economic and geopolitical crises inherent in the modernization process had a profound impact on how elites and the state viewed the large immigrant population in the United States.
In response to the devastating effects of economic transformation, thousands of French, German, Irish and other immigrants led uprisings like the Whiskey Rebellion and Shay’s Rebellion, which were viewed as threats by elites, especially the Federalists.
In the face of both popular unrest and Republican competition for political power, and in their efforts to consolidate the state and the globally oriented mercantile and pre-industrial capitalist economy,
Hamilton and then-President Adams did what has, since their time, become a standard operating procedure in the art of U.S. statecraft: build the state and insert its control apparatus in the larger populace by scapegoating immigrants as threats to national security.
In the words of historian John Morton Smith, “The internal security program adopted by the Federalists during the Administration of John Adams was designed not only to deal with potential dangers from foreign invasion growing out of the “Half War” with France, but also to repress domestic political opposition.”(17)In this context, immigrants became the domestic expression of the threat represented by the French Jacobins, the proto-communist and al Qaeda-like subversive threat of the early nineteenth century.
Commenting on this threat, Samuel Sitgreaves, a Federalist Congressman from Pennsylvania, made the connection between internal immigrant threats and external big power threats when he said in May 1798 “….the business of defence would be very imperfectly done, if Congress confined their operations of defence to land and naval forces, and neglected to destroy the cankerworm which is corroding the heart of the country…there are a great number of aliens in this country…
Related @ Technorati: 1776, 1919 Red Scare, 4th Branch Of The Government, 9/11, A. Mitchell Palmer, Abuse Of Authority, Adolf Eichmann, African American, African American History, African-American History, Agrarian Reform, Agricultural-Industrial Complex, Agriculture, al Qaeda, Alexander Hamilton, Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, Alternative Education, American Culture, American Democracy, American Economy, American Labor, American Labor Union, American Lifestyle, Anti-Communism, Anti-Federalist, Armed Citizen Patrol, Arms Industry, Authoritarian, Black Politics, Blackwater, Boeing, Bogeyman, Bolshevik, Border Security, Border Vigilante, Border Wall, Border War, Bureaucracy, Bush Administration, Bush Family Ranch, Bush War, BushCo, BushWar, Capitalist, Capitalist Economics, Civil Liberties, Civil Rights, Class Struggle, Class War, Classist, Cold War, Communist, Constitutional Freedom, Constitutional History, Constitutional Rights, Corporate Ethics, Corrections Corporation of America, Criminology, Cultural Assimilation, Declaration of Independence, Defense Spending, Democracy, Department Of Homeland Insecurity, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, Diplomacy, DOJ, Domestic Militarism, Domestic Security, Domestic Security Apparatus, Domestic Surveillance, Domestic Terrorism, Economic Interests, Economics, Elvira Arellano, Emma Goldman, Empire, Ethnic Minorities, Factory Worker, Farmworker, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Law, Federalist, Fourth Branch Of The Government, French Jacobins, French revolution, Fries’ Rebellion, General Electric, Global Business, Global Capitalist Economy, Global Corporations, Global Economy, Global War on Terror, Globalization, Globalized Business, GWOT, Habeas Corpus, Halliburton, Historical Revisionism, History, Homeland Insecurity, Homeland Security, HR 4437, Human Rights, Human Rights Abuse, ICE, ICE raid, Ideology, Illegal Immigrants, Illegal Immigration, Illuminati, Immigrant, Immigrant Rights, Immigrant Worker, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Immigration Policy, Immigration reform, Imperialism, Imperialist, Imperialist Economics, Indentured Labor, Indentured Worker, Industrialization, INS, Instrumentalized Immigrants, Iraq, IWW, J. Edgar Hoover, James Sensenbrenner, John Morton Smith, Jurisprudence, Justice Department, Keynes, Labor, Labor Law, Labor Organizer, Labor Organizing, Law, Law Enforcement, Little Eichmann, Lou Dobbs, Low Income, Low Income Worker, Mainstream Media, Malthus, Marcus Garvey, Media, Media Concentration, Media Coverage, Media Disinformation, Media Spin, Mexico, Migrant Detention Center, Migrant Worker, Migrant-Military industrial Complex, Migration, Militarism, Militarization, Military Commissions Act, Military Spending, Military State, Military Technology, Military-Industrial Complex, National Guard, National Insecurity, National Security policy, National Security Strategy, National Security Threat, National Strategy for Homeland Security, New America Media, New World Order, New World Police State, Patriot Act, Pentagon, Persecution, Pinkerton Detective Agency, Political Philosophy, Political Policy, Politically Motivated Persecution, Politics, Poverty, Power Elite, Pre-industrial Capitalism, president John Adams, Presidential History, Prison-Industrial Complex, Project Censored, Psychosocial Stress, Public Diplomacy, Race Riots, Race-related, Racism, Real Immigration Reform, Realpolitik, Red Scare, Red Scare of 1919, Regin Schmidt, Republican, Republican Culture of Corruption, Republican Party, Samuel Sitgreaves, SBI, Scapegoat, Scapegoating, Scapegoating Immigrants, Secure Border Initiative, Shay’s Rebellion, Skull and Bones, Slave Labor, Social Control, Social Justice, Social Problems, Socialism, Socioeconomic, Sociology, State Terror, Surveillance, Surveillance Technology, Sweatshop, Terrorism, Terrorist, Thomas Jefferson, Transnational Business, Transnational Corporation, U.S. Domestic Policy, U.S. Economy, U.S. Foreign Policy, U.S. Governance, U.S. Government, U.S. History, U.S. Interests, U.S. Marine Corps, U.S. Marines, U.S.-Mexico border, Undocumented Immigrant, Union Membership, Union-Busting, United Negro Improvement Association, Urbanization, Wage Slave, Whiskey Rebellion, Wobblies, World War I, Xenophobia
Sphere: Related ContentLeave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Posts
III The Lessons of History
IV Immigrants and the Establishment of the National Security State
Immigrants and immigration policy of the post-revolutionary period became ensnared in the battle for power between Federalists, who advocated a more urban and mercantile route to nationhood, and the anti-Federalist Republicans led by Thomas Jefferson,
The political, economic and geopolitical crises inherent in the modernization process had a profound impact on how elites and the state viewed the large immigrant population in the United States.
Hamilton and then-President Adams did what has, since their time, become a standard operating procedure in the art of U.S. statecraft: build the state and insert its control apparatus in the larger populace by scapegoating immigrants as threats to national security.















